The Intolerable Muslims and Their Appeasers

By way of introduction (again): When two cultures are not at all compatible and little ground exists for mutual respect and harmony then one or the other must prevail. The problem that Muslims will have in the US is that as one learns more about Islam there is more to be concerned about…. It is time, fellow citizens, to become aware of the world around us and guard against the Islamic Front Groups that operate in our midst.
Hugh McPherson, Blogpost introduction to “The Intolerable Muslims” posting, November 10, 2010


Representative King’s hearings looking into the radicalization of Muslims in the United States is just and it is necessary. But it targets one church, one religion say the critics. One witness at the hearings defined CAIR and others of the Muslim Brotherhood’s front groups (i.e., a group that hides its true purpose and its true affiliations) as “political Muslims”. He made this differentiation to lead us to believe that most US Muslims are only religious Muslims and came to America to practice their faith freely. While I love the concept and the idealist in me wants it to be true, it is not a demonstrated truth. Until American Muslims denounce sharia, denounce Muslim terrorism, and redefine the Koran’s principles of jihad and infidel there will be no differentiation between the political and religious Muslims. For now and for the last 1300 years how a Muslim lives inside and outside the mosque is strictly controlled by sharia.

Pat Condell’s youtube video “The Criminal Truth” excoriates European political correctness and the utter failure of multi-culturalism. Islam and Muslims are intolerant and do not integrate in any culture but their own. They can speak all sorts of excrement against Western culture and “infidel” nations but respond to any criticism in return with ignorant and robotic violence. The Danish cartoon controversy is a case in point. Muslims insist on accommodation because they see their ideology as superior to any other. Because it is based on the will of their god the West cannot negotiate compromise. Western values and Islam are incompatible and Islam seeks that we submit. As a man Islam is not too distasteful; Islam is the perfect venue for male chauvinism, woman-hating, homophobia, and pedophilia. Women have no freedom and are one step above a Muslim man’s mule or camel (e.g., consider honor killings), just maybe.

“Our press is absolutely complicit in all of this and it really is up to grassroots to get the word out and keep spreading the message. Thank God for the internet in a world where the watchdog media has morphed into such a specious, meretricious lapdog."
Author’s friend, March 13, 2011, in response to The Criminal Truth


The European “elite” has increasingly asserted that any questioning of Islam is criminal.  A few weeks ago Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff was fined 480 Euros for the “denigration of religious teachings of a legally recognized religion in Austria.” In a three-part seminar Mrs. Sabaditsch-Wolff had referred to Islam’s prophet Mohammed’s marriage to Aisha. According to generally-accepted Islamic textual tradition, Aisha was six at the time of the marriage, which was consummated when she was nine. Mrs. Sabaditsch-Wolff asked rhetorically “if this does not constitute pedophilia, what does?”

Defending the doctrines, beliefs, and figures of various “legally recognized” religions is liable to have unanticipated consequences. As Mrs. Sabaditsch-Wolff observes, “the judge didn’t deny that Mohammed had sex with a nine year old. It is actually now proven in court that Mohammed had sex with a nine year-old.” However, she says, “it’s just that I am not allowed to say that he was a pedophile.” Mrs. Sabaditsch-Wolff is not allowed to, because, in the words of the judge, as she passed sentence, “pedophilia is a sexual preference which solely or mainly is directed towards children. Nevertheless, it does not apply to Mohammad. He was still married to Aisha when she was 18.”  Law in Austria: Guilty for Questioning Islam, March 9, 2011
http://www.internationalfreepresssociety.org/2011/03/law-in-austria-guilty-for-questioning-islam/

Please look into this subject and conclude to your own satisfaction that Islam is a religious farce and part of a whole-life, totalitarian system that is anchored in sharia and the barbaric whims of its Immams. We think only a few Muslims are radical because only the most vocal capture our attention and Western appeasers cower and conceal the truth. Consider Pakistan, an undisclosed number of mosques in the US, large portions of SE Asia and Europe and we are logically left to conclude that Islam is the problem. While terrorists appear to be a statistical minority, Muslims around the world subscribe to the Islamic teachings and, in silent assent, become complicit in the terrorist violence of "the minority". Of course, this glosses over the cancerous silent killer in our midst, the cultural jihad of the Muslim Brotherhood and its front groups in the US. First among these front groups is CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations. And, by the way, I've just Islamically slandered CAIR because they won't LIKE that I said what I've said.

Be sure, however, that you are up to the task of pulling off the blinders of denial or of ignorance. Muslims want us to believe the illusion they weave for us when challenged. If any of us become too vocal or are considered a danger, we will be accused of blasphemy (punishable by death) or at the very least of slander. How do Muslims define slander?

In Islamic law, the definition of slander doesn’t involve falsehood. The Shafi’i manual of Islamic law ‘Umdat al-Salik, which is certified by Al-Azhar in Cairo as a reliable guide to Sunni Muslim orthodoxy, defines “slander” as “to mention anything concerning a person that he would dislike.” Nothing is said about whether or not what is said is true — only that the person would dislike it. And this is based on a statement of Muhammad to the same effect.  As posted in Jihad Watch, April 8, 2009

This controversy is not about tolerance; we are tolerant and Muslims are not. This is not about our First Amendment; Muslim speech is not protected when they act as unregistered foreign agents seeking to do our nation harm. This is not about freedom of religion; Muslims use their mosques and schools to further the radical agenda of Islam’s Wahabi sect, largely funded by Saudi Arabia. Criminals in prison are the targets of recruitment efforts by Muslim radicals. All this is contrary to our laws and our culture.

Our Constitution and Islam are incompatible. It appears there is little or no ground for mutual respect or peaceful coexistence. Therefore we as Americans have no choice but to act and ensure that our way of life prevails.

Strength and Honor.