[Author’s note: With
the move by the Council on American Islamic Relations, Texas Chapter, to
establish a Shariah Tribunal in Dallas it is time to raise awareness of this
unconstitutional and seditious project and other treasonous actions by the
Muslim Brotherhood inside the United States. In the course of several postings I will make
clear to you the nature of Islam and the realities of shariah. Most importantly you will come to clearly
understand why shariah is completely incompatible with Western values and
traditions of freedom. Islam and shariah are totally inconsistent
with the United States Constitution and that is my inspiration for making the
Muslim’s not-so-secret war on the West known to you. I do this in the hopes of alerting all
non-Muslims to the onerous and dangerous threat in our midst. In the course of my postings you will come to
understand the fundamental tenets of the Muslim “religion”, its totalitarian
aspirations, their deceptive tactics for infiltrating Western institutions, and
the need for all non-Muslims to awake and take action against an insidious and
evil enemy in our midst.
Most of the
information I will convey will be drawn from an excellent study published by
the Center for Security Policy entitled SHARIAH: The Threat to America. I encourage you to read the book and it is
available as a free download at http://Shariahthethreat.org/; click on “About
the Book” and download it in pdf format.
Other sources will be cited within the postings.]
PART FIVE: Islam’s international threat, the
unconstitutional nature of Islam, US leadership failures, and a view toward
solutions
I have named many of the Muslim Brotherhood front groups in the
United States. I’ve mentioned the overt
violence by Hamas and Hezbollah and their growing presence in many countries in
Central and South America. Their
subversive tactics In the employment of stealth jihad within a nation is one
thing but the threat of international stealth jihad is being entirely
overlooked by the press and most politicians (yours and mine).
The international threat stems from the Organization of the
Islamic Conference or OIC. It is second in size only to the United Nations and
consists of 56 Muslim countries plus “Palestine”. The OIC purports to represent the entire
Islamic world and represents itself as the Ummah (the collective of all those
who worship Allah, follow Mohammed and revere the Koran). The documentary Silent Conquest clearly
portrays how the OIC actively seeks to further the transnational ambitions of
the Muslim Brotherhood and silence all opposition to sharia law or Islam. Therefore, it is imperative to track OIC
activities for, if the Caliphate is ever reestablished, it will most probably
grow out of the Organization of the Islamic Conference.
The obligation to enforce sharia law globally is central to
the OIC mission and to its concept of unifying the Ummah. In its Ten-Year Program of Action to Meet the
Challenges Facing the Muslim Ummah in the 21st Century conference in
2005 Article VII calls for “deterrent punishments” to be imposed by all states,
not just Muslim states, against critics of Islam.
The OIC is dedicated to opposing western traditions of
liberty, freedom, and human rights since those traditions assert the rights of
the individual rather than the submission of the individual to sharia. The OIC provides an intellectual
justification for terrorism that exempts jihad outright. Individual destructive acts are not seen as
terrorism. This was used by the Muslim
Brotherhood with success as their influence operations in Washington DC led to
the policy framework for the US Department of Defense’s refusal to define the
murder of thirteen people by Major Nidal Hasan as an act of jihad or terrorism
in 2010. The terrorist act was defined
instead as an individual destructive act, in full compliance with OIC
publications on terrorism. Seen from
another angle, the Department of Defense submitted to sharia.
I have discussed the incompatibility between the US
Constitution and sharia law (aka, Islam).
The Constitution was crafted by men and it is based on an individual’s
right to God-given freedoms. It is the
individual as part of We the People that retains most power while endowing
government with just enough to serve its citizens. Sharia cannot tolerate freedom and seeks to
make each individual to submit to sharia.
Everything concerning and individual’s life is then fully regimented by
the 6th century religious fabrication. Once sharia is known and understood its foul
nature is quickly grasped and its abuses clearly seen.
Many in the United States would think that we are being
attacked by Muslims waging jihad for the first time. This is not the case:
In 1876, Thomas Jefferson, ambassador to France, and John
Adams, ambassador to England, met with the emissary of the Islamic potentates
of Tripoli to Britain, Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, regarding the demands for
tribute being made at the time by the so-called Barbary Pirates.
After this meeting Jefferson and Adams sent a report to
Congress. The most relevant portion
follows: “We took the liberty to make
some inquiries concerning the Grounds of their pretentions to make war upon
Nations who had done them no Injury, and observed that we considered all
mankind as our friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any
provocation….The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of
their prophet, that it was written in their Qur’an, that all nations who should
not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and
duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of
all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman [author note: from the Persian musulman, meaning Muslim)
who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
After this, Jefferson purchased and read the Koran in order
to know his enemy. That knowledge of his
adversary led to his doctrine of “Millions for defense, but not one cent for
tribute”. Jefferson understood his
obligation to be educated on the factual aspects of the principles, doctrines,
objectives, jurisprudence and theology of sharia that comprised his enemy’s
threat doctrine. Bluntly, our enemy are
all Muslims that submit to sharia and sharia commands jihad and jihad is life
threatening to all non-Muslims or kafirs.
John Adams later wrote about the threat of Islam and stated, “As the
essential principle of [Mohammed’s] faith is the subjugation of others by the
sword; it is only by force, that his false doctrines can be dispelled, and his
power annihilated.” Christians teach
love and Muslims submit to hate.
Because of the availability of relevant material on sharia
law (see www.politicalislam.com) it is inexcusable that those in our government
charged with our protection to be ignorant of the Islamic threat in our midst
and around the world.
How are we vulnerable to a threat masquerading as a
religion?
Truth as supported by facts, history and logic has been
vanquished by “politically correct” efforts to impose on us and our elected
leaders an understanding of Islam that hides the centrality of sharia, jihad,
and Islamic supremacism. This leaves us
exposed and forced to rely on our individual efforts to defend ourselves
against Muslim attacks that are no longer an IF but rather a WHEN. Our leaders in politics, intelligence and law
enforcement ignorantly listen to the sweet lies of the Muslim Brotherhood
agents and urge us all to remain calm, that no threat exists in our
nation. We must keep something uppermost
in our minds, if our leaders are not ignorant then they are seditious and
supporting an enemy that is waging jihad on us each and every day.
Each culture has the right to be proud of its
traditions. Most cultures are worth
learning about and often have great sources of knowledge. When I visit a foreign country I look forward
to experiencing the differences; personally, I detest running into an American
fast food operation outside the US.
Multi-culturalism within one country is impossible, in my opinion,
without a common element and language to unite its citizenry. Historically this was achieved in the US
through language and allegiance to the Constitution. Today few are conversant with our founding
principles and documents. More illegal
immigrants want the benefits of the US while retaining allegiance to another
nation and its culture. Then we have the
dangerous Muslims within who submit to sharia and thereby hold no allegiance to
the US Constitution or its laws.
The West is the source of the liberating ideas of individual
liberty, political democracy, the rule of man-made law, human rights and
cultural freedom. It is the West that
has raised the status of women, fought against slavery and defended freedom of
inquiry, expression and conscience. Islam or sharia does not champion any of these
traditions. Sharia supports slavery and
barbarity. When seen through the lenses
of Western values, Islam is at once exposed as a fake and man-made “religion”
that in reality is a political-military totalitarian system.
Part Six will cover the need to get rid of multi-culturalism,
the need to speak clearly (politically incorrectly) about sharia and its
threat. We must consider the need to
forbid Muslim immigration while outlawing any practice of sharia within our national
borders. After all, Saudi Arabia does
not allow for the expression of any other faith within its borders. Why is Saudi Arabia so intent on building
mosques and Islamic schools in the West?
Why does Saudi Arabia support the Muslim Brotherhood? The irony is palpable; the hypocrisy is
odious; the purpose is seditious.
Strength and Honor
Hugh
No comments:
Post a Comment